Prime Minister Balendra Shah’s remarks on the Nepal-India border dispute in Parliament on Sunday have triggered criticism from opposition parties, border experts, and civil society members.
Responding to lawmakers’ questions in the House of Representatives, Shah stated that after assuming office, he learned that “not only has India encroached on Nepal’s land, but Nepal has also encroached on India’s land in many places.” He stressed that both countries should examine the facts and resolve outstanding border issues through dialogue and mutual understanding.
The prime minister said Nepal had already sent a diplomatic note to India regarding the disputed areas of Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura, and Kalapani and received a response indicating both sides had agreed to pursue negotiations involving historians, surveyors, and border experts. He also noted that discussions were being held with Britain, citing the historical roots of the dispute during the British colonial period.
However, Shah’s assertion that Nepal had also encroached on Indian territory drew strong objections from the main opposition Nepali Congress. Observers have cautioned that the prime minister’s statement could weaken Nepal’s negotiating position on disputed territories, including Limpiyadhura, Kalapani, and Susta.
The controversy has reignited public debate over Nepal-India border issues, diplomatic sensitivities, and the responsibilities attached to high public office.